|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 1 user and 42 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Bert on Thu, 11/13/2008 - 6:07pm.
Even if the funding for a park doesn't currently exist, that is no reason to deny the eventual opportunity to build a park. I believe that a park on the Isthmus is feasible. Why? Well, most importantly, I think that the residents and future residents of Olympia need a park. Why do we need a park? We need a park on the Isthmus because
Submitted by Just another voice on Sun, 09/28/2008 - 2:55pm.
In November of 2002, the City Council adopted the Parks, Arts & Recreation Plan, which established the goals and policies of implementing new parks and selecting park and open space properties. This plan also amended the Growth Management Act ordinance, originally passed in 1994.
Submitted by Just another voice on Tue, 06/24/2008 - 11:55am.
Thought I would also round up some other growth that is on the table around the city. These are either priliminary submissions to the city or project discussions, or may have already begun. Like with the clearing near Division & Walnut Rd, these things can slip by with little to no fuss. Take the entire moonscaping of the development along Mud Bay & Evergreen Pkway/101 Interchange for example. That will soon be a 58-Acre development. It is slated to have 231 single-family lots, 24 duplexes, 63 triplexes, 54 sixplexes, 20 townhomes, and commercial buildings with at least 7000 sq ft of floor space. And lots of garage doors. Link to location here. <break> 1. Trillium Neighborhood 'Village' Master Plan
2. Bing Apartments
3. Prather Valley Park
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 06/20/2008 - 10:47am.
It seemed to me that the consensus last night was that there is a need and a desire for more housing downtown - dense urban "high rise" housing. And secondly there was consensus that the "isthmus"* is not the right place for the development of high rise buildings - for whatever purpose - and that the proposal and amendment to rezone that area should be denied swiftly and firmly.
»
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 3:19pm.
The following is an excerpt from a Green Pages article written by former Mayor Bob Jacobs. He is a member of Friends of the Waterfront, a group that is opposed to a rezone proposal for urban waterfront areas on the isthmus (peninsula). The proposal would accommodate building heights (and luxury condominiums) of over 90 feet in some areas. The current building height limit is 35 (plus some roof-top utility structure.)
» ...See here for information on tonight's community downtown Olympia envisioning forum: olyblog.net/speech-sponsors-community-forum-envision-downtown-olympia
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Thu, 06/12/2008 - 4:59pm.
I was reading Logarithm's blog about the new clear cut on Division. I was similarly shocked by the view when I went by there today. Here are some images from the area.
»
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 12:07pm.
This sagely wisdom is applicable to how governments plan and develop, and how our economy is so quick to assume growth as a panacea - growth, seemingly, at all costs. This has local relevance in so far as local city officials are now considering many different development projects. There are objections to these projects based on the analysis that harm is being done and future generations will largely bear the burden of present day decisions:
»
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Mon, 02/04/2008 - 4:16pm.
Today's Olympian featured an article on the proposal to build new multi-use high rise buildings in the area between Capitol Lake and Budd Bay.
» Can Olympia use high-rise buildings of this type, is there demand? What are the likely positive and negative outcomes of such development? (tax revenue, cultural benefit etc. v. obstruction of view, obstruction of wildlife corridor, other undesirable environmental impacts, etc.)
Submitted by chad360 on Sun, 12/16/2007 - 7:39pm.
I think that the citizenry should engage in planning the future of the community by using GIS to map resources. Without resource mapping, there is little to plan. --more site! pls post if you have stuff in this vein! Thanks Meta- FYI: TerraCommon is building towards EcoCity Olympia, a convergence & celebration of green living Spring 2008; those interested in participation please feel free to contact TerraCommons & Chad360 directly. |
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|