|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 11 users and 105 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sun, 01/20/2008 - 12:02am.
Jan 24 2008 - 7:00pm Bringing Resistance Home with Kathy Kelly |
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events |
which is calling on
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sun, 01/20/2008 - 2:44am.Logistically, I don't think this could happen.
I would probably change this mission statement (I realize it's Ms. Kelly's, so I don't know if I'm wasting a post) to begin withdrawal or something to the extent of equipment and personnel in the process of leaving.
Unless I simply misread the mission and its intent is that an announcement must be made within the first 100 days.
Either way, I wouldn't expect too many tangible signs that we're leaving Iraq from any elected administration in a little over three months in office.
not sure
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sun, 01/20/2008 - 10:03am.I also agree that withdrawal should not be pursued in a hasty manner. Although it should be expedient and most importantly complete, I think a rapid and hasty withdrawal would be wrong. What I would like to see is a complete shift from military mission to humanitarian. Spend the resources we are now spending on destruction, instead on reconstruction, building schools, hospitals, civilian infrastructure (bridges, roads, sewage, water, electrical, etc.).
Withdrawal ought to begin immediately. But I think a reasonable time line for the completion of a complete withdrawal is somewhere around 10 to 12 months.
How to Redeploy: Implementing a Responsible Drawdown of U.S. Forces from Iraq [by Lawrence Kolb, center for American Progress]
100 days
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sun, 01/20/2008 - 10:06am.Withdrawal ought to begin
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sun, 01/20/2008 - 12:50pm.Not only is it reasonable, but that's more than likely what would have to happen. Moving personnel is one thing, but I'm almost certain we couldn't move that much equipment out of Iraq in three months if we wanted to.
You don't need to take my word for it, though. The Washington Times has an article from October 2007 detailing how long an exit would take.
Lawrence J. Korb, former assistant defense secretary under President Reagan, says "an orderly and safe withdrawal is best achieved over a 10- to 12-month period." We would only be leaving Iraq in the time line proposed (demanded?) by SoDaPOP if an all-out civil war were to erupt.
And no, I won't be able to attend. I won't be back in the U.S. until September 2008 at the earliest. As I mentioned in another thread, I'm attempting to land another foreign duty station. So that date may be even later.
the washington times
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sun, 01/20/2008 - 7:18pm.I agree with you about the Kolb analysis. But I am curious to know why VCNV is "demanding" complete withdrawal within 100 days. Maybe it's because they figure by demanding that, they are likely to get the most expedient withdrawal possible, rather than advocate a more practical approach and get something less.
I am looking forward to this event.
Submitted by Mike on Sun, 01/20/2008 - 10:38am.